加拿大网课代写:相同的事实

Keywords:加拿大网课代写:相同的事实

然而，有可能获得相同的事实，不同的理论可能产生。这也许是因为事实并不一定是正确的,因为他们可能是事实”说简单语句声明事实但可以是假的(真正)或因为他们没有遇到任何异常通过调查使用的方法,他们如果他们不尝试在不同的情况下。如果他们说的是事实，那么研究人员很可能没有遵循科学方法，而只是从一个特定假设的假设中推导出一个理论。因为所有的理论都至少有一个例外，它们可能不是百分之百正确的，因为相同的理论并不适用于所有可能影响结果的情况。自然科学中的一个例子是气体定律，只有在温度保持恒定的情况下才适用。但话说回来，温度必须保持恒定可能是理论的一个关键事实。前面已经提到，需要理性来理解所获得的事实。推理方法可能会因研究者的不同而有所不同，这就是为什么一些理论会被创造出来，但在几年之后会被重新审视，因为他们没有以一种更合乎逻辑的方式将事实结合在一起。这是牛顿的宇宙理论的一个例子,他说,宇宙是无限的,静态的,包含和无数的恒星同样分散然而,多年后由Olber发现,如果有无限数量的恒星同样分散之后,晚上就不存在因为宇宙将明亮的四面八方。然而，如何判断一种理论是否真的成立呢?因为由于进一步的研究和对事实的更深入的了解，它们偶尔会发生突然的变化。那么，我们能相信我们所得到的所有理论吗?语言也可发挥重要作用,因为它可以通过不同的研究人员和也有不同的解释,翻译成其他语言时,让它可以对其他个体,有些可能会丢失和可能不再是一个真正的理论组成的真正的事实。因此，很明显，在自然科学知识领域中建立理论是需要事实的，但是，由于进一步的事实被发现，理论往往会发生变化。
加拿大网课代写:相同的事实
However, it is possible that give access to the same facts, different theories may result. This is perhaps because the facts were not necessarily true because they could have been ‘said facts’, just plain statements declaring something as a fact but can be false (as well as true) or because they did not encounter any exceptions through the method they used in their investigation if they did not try in different situations. If they were said facts, then the researchers, most likely, did not follow the scientific method and simply derived a theory from an assumption for a specific hypothesis. Since all theories are subjected to at least one exception, they might not be a hundred per cent true because the same theory does not apply to every possible situation that may affect the outcome. An example of this in the natural sciences is on the laws of gases which only apply if the temperature is kept constant. But then again, the temperature having to be kept constant may be a key fact part of the theory. It was previously mentioned that reason is needed to make sense of the facts obtained. Reasoning methods may vary from a researcher to another which is why some theories are created but are reviewed after a few years because they did not put the facts together in a more logical manner. An example of this is Newton’s Universe theory in which he stated that the universe is infinite and static and contains and infinite number of stars equally dispersed however, it was many years later discovered by Olber that if there was an infinite number of stars equally dispersed then, the night would not exist since the universe would be bright in all directions at all times. However, how is it possible to tell if one theory is really true since they are occasionally subjected to sudden changes due to further research and more accessibility to facts into the field? Can we then believe all of the theories we are presented with? Language also has an important role to play since it can be interpreted differently by different researchers and also, when it is translated into other languages to make it accessible for other individuals, some of the sense might be lost and might stop being a true theory composed of true facts. It is therefore clear that facts are needed to establish theories in the area of knowledge of natural sciences but often, the theories might be subjected to changes due to further facts being discovered.