北美代写留学生作业:独特的领域

Keywords:北美代写留学生作业:独特的领域

我认为好的和坏的都来自于约翰·杜威的教育思想。首先，我喜欢杜威的教学风格，他不再强调死记硬背和反刍事实。实践经验对学生来说是一种行之有效的学习方法。它对学生来说更有趣，似乎直接适用于他们的未来。我也同意杜威的观点，学生应该学习他们感兴趣的东西。把孩子们没有任何学习欲望的事实塞进嘴里对任何人都没有好处。当学生能够真正接触到他们正在学习的材料时，他们就更有可能投入必要的时间和精力来充分发展他们对一门学科的知识和理解。最后，我认为这是一个好主意，把你的研究集中在一个特定的领域，因为它是非常困难的，掌握多种科目。我认为精通一门学科比掌握多门学科的平均知识要好。这样，每个人都可以选择一个他们感兴趣的研究领域，然后，作为一个社区，每个人都可以把他们的一个独特的领域的专业知识摆到桌面上，而其他人在这一学科不是很流利，可以受益。话虽如此，我认为上述原则需要适度应用。虽然记忆和重复并不是一种完美的教学形式，但其结果是不容置疑的。我相信掌握一门学科是有道理的。例如，我的专业领域是会计。对于我来说，获得直接适用于我专业的经验是一回事，但是学习不能仅仅通过“玩”来实现。我必须首先研究所有的基础信息。世界上有很多人在这方面比我更有知识，我可以从他们身上学到很多有价值的东西。其次，要想成为一名成功的会计，我还必须掌握其他核心科目。例如，我需要有英语知识才能和我的同事交流，我需要知道数学，这样我就可以计算会计所需的公式。接受全面的教育是有价值的。学习可能不直接适用于你研究领域的科目，可以在很多方面让你受益。举个例子，也许它可以提高你的批判性思维能力。最重要的是，一个学生可能会认为他们对某一门课程不感兴趣，直到他们真正上了一门课，了解了它。努力工作和长时间在图书馆——有时记原则和公式——对我成为会计硕士是必要的，尽管我可能不喜欢那份工作。在我看来，杜威的教育体系似乎鼓励人们跳过主菜，直接吃甜点。我认为我首先需要掌握会计的原理，这样我才有机会走进现实世界，真正“做”会计。
北美代写留学生作业:独特的领域
I think that both good and bad come from John Dewey’s ideas for education. First off, I like Dewey’s movement away from teaching styles that stressed only memorization and the regurgitation of facts. Hands-on experience is a proven way for students to learn. It is much more enjoyable for the student and seems to be directly applicable to their future. I also agree with Dewey’s view that students should learn about something that interests them. Stuffing facts that kids do not have any desire to learn down their throats is not beneficial to anyone. When students can actually connect with the material they are learning, they are more likely to put in the time and effort that is necessary to fully develop their knowledge and understanding of a subject. Lastly, I believe that it’s a good idea to focus your studies in one particular area as it is very difficult to master a multitude of subjects. I think it’s better to be extremely proficient in one subject than to have an average amount of knowledge in multiple subjects. This way, everyone can pick an area of study that interests them and then, as a community, each person can bring their one unique area of expertise to the table and the rest of the people that aren’t as fluent in that subject can benefit. With that being said, I think the preceding principles need to be applied in moderation.While memorization and repetition is not a perfect form of teaching, the results are hard to argue with. I believe that there is something to be said for mastering a subject. For example, my major area of study is accounting. It is one thing for me to get hands on experience directly applicable to my major, but learning cannot just come through “playing” so to speak. I must first study all the foundational information that is out there. There are many people in the world that are much more knowledgeable on the subject than me and there are a lot of valuable things I can learn from them. Secondly, to be a successful accountant, there are other core subjects that I must be competent in. For instance, I need to be knowledgeable in English to be able to communicate with my coworkers and I need to know math so I am able to compute the formulas required in accounting. There is a proven value in having a rounded education. Learning about subjects that may not directly apply to your area of study can benefit you in many different ways. As an example, perhaps it could sharpen your critical thinking skills. And on top of that, a student might think they are not interested in a certain subject until they actually take a class and learn about it. Hard work and long hours spent in the library-sometimes memorizing principles and formulas-is necessary for me to be a master of accounting, although I may not enjoy that work. To me, Dewey’s education system seems to encourage skipping the main course and going straight to dessert. I believe that I first need to master the principles of accounting in order to deserve a shot of going out into the real world and actually “doing” accounting.